Morality is Malleable

Morality isn’t what it used to be. In the past, morality was a fixed thing, whether you got it from Confucius, mitzvahs, the Ten Commandments, or the Koran. However, at some time morality became a point of discussion and disagreement. When did that happen? In the West, maybe with Martin Luther and the 95 Theses…I don’t know.

Certainly, a generally accepted morality today is hard to define. Definitely, Ilhan Omar’s morality is not my morality: “CAIR was founded after 9/11, because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.” Morality differs person to person. It differs by situation. Morality also changes over time. For example:

  • Slavery and racism were OK, now they aren’t;
  • capital punishment and public executions were OK, now they aren’t;
  • colonialism was OK, now it isn’t;
  • abortion was not OK, now it’s a subject for intense debate.

“We can’t have morals and ethics unless we have some concrete rules about what is right and wrong. Otherwise, everyone’s ideas of right and wrong can fluctuate depending on their views, culture, background, needs.”

Anonymous

These changes raise some questions:

  • What are the sources of our current ethical truths? Are these sources credible?
  • Are the sources of your ethical rules credible to me? Are my sources credible to you? If we don’t agree on ethical standards, what then?
  • How do we know when morality has changed? For example: is Rip Van Winkle at fault if he wakes up and commits a gaffe by not realizing that vagrants are now a ‘protected community’?

“standards of morality that are based on human logic are precarious. The human mind is capable of rationalizing and modifying morality to meet a person’s needs or desires.”

Rabbi Abraham J. Twerski

Laws require lawmakers. Don’t morals require some ultimate source? If not, what makes morality different from a popularity contest? When morality is malleable, it becomes a tool for the unscrupulous.

Without a fixed, eternal source of moral guidance, how does a culture resist the unscrupulous? History shows us cases where individuals or cliques have promoted ideologies and moralities that we now view with revulsion: Soviet Russia, China during the Cultural Revolution, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under Pol Pot.

The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.

Theodore Parker

Justice is morality meted out in the real world. Laws are society’s concrete implementation of morality. However, references to justice (or “social justice”) might be made in a political context, and will assume a particular morality; but whose morality? You will do well to wonder. You might be witnessing groupthink in action, or a political huckster trying to sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.

Bottom Line
If there is no absolute point of reference for ethical maxims, why should we obey them? Just asking.
Do you find the implications of this troubling? Me too.
Be skeptical when you hear people justify their proposals by making calls to “justice”. Whose justice?

Service provider from hell — Iridium

My history with satellite phones didn’t begin with Iridium, it began around 2002 or so with the SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger. The product was a cellphone-sized device with a button you pressed to send a distress call. I remember using it at least once, after I suffered a herniated disk in the back country. I thought I couldn’t walk. Soon enough I discovered I could walk, I just couldn’t stand erect. I also quickly realized there was no way to confirm my distress call was actually received: SPOT was not a two-way device. Sometimes messages were received, sometimes not. SPOT relies on the Globalstar satellite network, and it’s just simply inherent in satellite messaging that your connection is not 100% continuous.

My satellite phone reseller recommended I try an Iridium satellite phone. After more than fifteen years as an Iridium user my experience is that Iridium provides a valuable service, but you need to approach it carefully, and of course know it’s not strictly as advertised.

Iridium offers three services: voice calls, voice mail, and SMS messaging. Each of these relies on access to Iridium’s network of satellites. For years the story on Iridium’s service was “yes we know…we’re working on a new satellite constellation”. Iridium says the new constellation is now complete, but I don’t see any improvement in connectivity.

The big limit – connectivity

Satellite phones rely on a network of satellites. Globalstar has theirs, Iridium has one, and GPS relies on a satellite network operated by the US Air Force. Keep three things in mind: 1. the satellites are constantly in motion, 2. in the northern hemisphere, the satellites are on your southern horizon so you need to be aware of buildings and hills blocking your signal, and 3. you may be standing still but the satellites are moving, so your connection quality is always changing. See the following chart.

I tracked signal strength minute-by-minute from 205pm to 305pm Pacific time on Saturday, 3/16/2019, sitting on my back porch in Seattle with a clear view to the south. In the chart below, the vertical axis is signal strength, five bars down to zero bars. The horizontal axis shows time. The vertical blue lines mark the times when the connection was broken, signaled on the phone by displaying zero bars and the message “searching for network”. Note that over that test hour my longest unbroken connections were two separate spans of about seven minutes each.

Iridium signal strength

One hour signal strength test

What follows is a summary of the Iridium services I have used, with the attractions and the problems.

Voice calls

What’s the attraction – A phone call is reliable. As long as the connection lasts you know you’re being heard. It’s two-way real-time communication.

The danger – The connection is short-lived, see the chart above. You can count on maybe three minutes at the outside, and then you’re on thin ice. Your connection will drop without warning; suddenly you’re talking to dead air, or the other guy stops talking. Was your last comment heard? Did you hear your partner’s last statement? No way to know. You will learn to front-load your conversations: deliver the important information immediately.

Voice mail

What’s the attraction – For friends trying to contact you on your satellite phone it’s fire and forget: “John isn’t answering, I’ll just leave him a voice mail.”

First problem – It’s a real bitch to access voice mail on an Iridium phone. First, it just takes too long to navigate the menus to get to your inbox. You’ll try to check voice mail, get knocked off. Try again, you get knocked off. Meanwhile, you’re standing outside, on an icy hillside in the dark, or somewhere in the rain? Yes, I didn’t mention: you have to go outside to use a satellite phone! You can’t talk to the satellite from under a roof, unless you install an antenna with a cable running inside to where you’re sitting.

As an experiment I tried to check voice mail three times, starting each time with a three-bar connection. The first try ended after about thirty seconds with the message “Could not place call. No connection.” The second try was successful. It took 45 seconds to work my way through the menus, but the connection held long enough to listen to a message and delete it. The third try ended with an “invalid entry” message after entering my password. Yes, my password entry was correct. It was displayed on the screen so I was able to double-check it. The number as entered was the right one.

Second problem – false confidence. I actively discourage use of voice mail on my Iridium number. Callers will think I got the message, because…they left me a voice mail, right? But see that ‘first problem’ above. I was never able to access the message, so I never heard it.

Text messaging

What’s the attraction – fire and forget, like voice mail.

First problem – entering and sending text messages is slow and tedious. You have to use the phone keypad to compose text messages. For example, to enter the word ‘red’ press the 7 key three times for the letter r, press the 3 key twice for e, press the 3 key once for d.

Second problem – you’ll have to try over and over, entering the message from scratch every time. Why? Because your connection window is so short. Start with three bars or better, typically by the time you’re ready to send you no longer have a connection. Often I’ll have to try three times before successfully sending a text message.

You might expect that you could enter the message once, save it as a draft, and just resend the draft, right? Sorry, no. Yes you can save a draft, but when you send it the phone deletes the draft. Go ahead, disbelieve. Tech support confirms that this behavior is ‘by design’. Apparently the assumption was that when you press send you will be successful. Again, my experience is that often I will have to re-enter and try sending three times before I’m successful.

Third problem – false confidence by the sat phone sender. Successful transmission does not mean your message will be received promptly, or received at all. I once sent three ‘test’ text messages to the same user. One was received immediately, the second was received a day later, the 3rd message was never received. Tech support’s explanation on this one is some verbal hand-waving about the multiple network handoffs between Iridium and your recipient’s cell phone or computer.

Fourth problem – false confidence by callers. The problem starts when someone sends a text message when the sat phone is off-line: either powered off or not connected to the network (see above). Iridium checks within 15 minutes to see if your phone is online. If that fails, it will check 30 minutes later, then an hour later, then three hours later, eventually only once per day. Think of it as a crack that gets wider as time passes. Text messages sent to the sat phone fall through that crack. Iridium never finds your phone online, so it never sends the text message.

My practice is to turn my phone on for an hour every morning and two hours every evening. Given the timing of Iridium’s connection checks, messages are sometimes delivered days late. You know what happens with your cell phone after going offline overnight. When you power it back on, bingo: a flood of stored text messages and emails. Not with Iridium.

The Bottom Line

Regardless of your preferred way of communicating: voice mail, text messages, voice calls: How do you know the messages you sent were delivered? How do you know you received all the messages and calls sent to you? Disclaimer — I can’t say that the competitors are any better.

Is Israel a Democracy?

There’s a category of question for which the best answer is: “Compared to what?” The question asked by my blog title is one of those, prompted by a recent comment on a long-ago post ‘Israel and the Presbyterians‘.

You mention above that Israel is… “the oldest democratic state in the Middle East..” Can you please tell me why – and give me examples – of your believe that Israel is a Democratic government?

Is Israel a democracy? I believe so, although Israel has engaged in some rough behavior. Many might point to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank as un-democratic. Equally, the United States is a democracy, but Bernie Sanders supporters can point to his treatment by Democratic party insiders as un-democratic.

Is Israel a democracy? Compared to what? Actually, there’s an index for that, published by the UK magazine the Economist. See the Wikipedia article here which reproduces that index as a ranked list, and the Economist’s own post here, providing a more graphical (my opinion – less useful) treatment.

According to the ranking published by Wikipedia, Israel is high on the list at 30, between France and Belgium. The United States ranks at 25. It’s significant that Israel’s neighbors don’t rank high as democracies: Egypt is 127, Jordan is 115, Iran is 150; all solidly in the bottom half of the list.

Wandering off-topic a bit, where do the seven countries in my Shithole Countries Index appear in the democracy index? The full democracy ranking contains 167 countries. Here are the seven bad-boy countries and their democracy rankings:

Central African Republic 164
Chad 163
Democratic Republic of Congo 165
Guinea-Bissau 157
Haiti 102
Liberia 93
Somalia (not listed)

None of them reach the top half in the democracy ranking. That indicates a link between democracy and material prosperity, yes?

Bottom Line
Yes, Israel is a democracy. Compared to what? Compared to France and Belgium. Compared to Iran and Egypt.